MaxwellGT2000 said:
psrock said:
vonboysp said:
psrock said:
Khuutra said:
psrock said:
And they also get some support ($) from MS and Sony which Nintendo won't ever do. Nintendo is not the nicest company to deal with either.
|
This isn't really fair. Nintendo not moneyhatting shouldn't be taken as a negative, because it shouldn't be expected
|
I never meant it to be negative, just being realsitic. A lot of company are stuck in the PS2 era, and they are not used no being the showcase as they were in the PS2. Third were the highlight and the best selling games, they made money putting out anything, it's not the same anymore and it's hard to admit for some reason.
They don't give Wii the big games because they would still be second class just because Nintendo games are what Nintendo fans want and like the most. I can't blame them.
Giving the big games to PS3 and 360 espacially in the West, makes them the top dog, the best selling games and they like that attention.
|
if they'd rather get attention then make a profit, fine by me.
|
Activision made 1 billion dollars in 2 months from one game, if they don't make a profit, we need to investigate.
|
The game generated 1 billion revenue, not all of that is money they "made", you gotta take out that 200 million ad campaign they touted first, then shipping, production, retail cut, development costs, taxes, etc etc...
|
so, it's still 800 million left and they still selling. Please, if you are going to use the revenue excuse, at least know the budget one.
Next Gen 
Essay Pro