rynx on 14 January 2010
| Ajescent said: I should point out that the average gamer (i.e not us internet folks) won't care or notice the compressing or whatever, point of interest, folks who bought Bayonetta for the ps3 regardless of how inferior to the 360 it was. using me as an example, till today I still don't get the purpose of comparisons made by Lens of truth and the likes comparing stuff like SF4 and RE5 went over me because A: I really saw no difference between the 2 games in their pictures B: regardless of what was said, I still played aforementioned games on my ps3, why? I: I only have a ps3, my choices are limited, it's either take it or lump it, if I choose to lump it, it really is no skin off their nose because they can a: count on other ps3 folks to buy their games b: There's also the small matter of 360 folks. II: Even if I did have a 360, at the end of the day I would only buy games for my favoured console. Also, note: if every ps3 owner boycotts poor ports, that only confirms that the port was not worth the effort and stops future folks from making ports because they ask "why bother?" |
again ill put it simple what you are saying is debatable. also the average gamer not caring or not being inform/noticing is the fault of the developers who are practicing 'console equality' therefor sony can not properly advertise. things get advertise everywhere billards, tv, radio, commercials, internet, but what can they talk about if both versions look the same? and why? of course you arent going to notice any difference if both games are identical even though the other can hold more content and use better, richer auido/video formats wouldnt that make is noticable? to anyone?
