SlimFat said:
radiantshadow92 said:
SlimFat said:
Are you blinder than ray charles was?
No support for massive online games and then you state the ps3 is the only console with more than 25 players per game?
Tell ya what go google a little 360 exclusive called Frontlines which supported 50 players and sometimes more online.
Then you want to go as far as talking about psn being equal to livw let me tell you where psn fails.
Its a pain in the ass to connect with friends.If my friend is in the middle of a game of call of duty and i wanted to play lets say killzone.I cant cross game chat can i?I have to litteraly send a invite hope hes paying attention during his game to notice and i cant coax him into joining me with a chat no i gotta hope hes in the mood to play something else.
psn sucks i had a ps3 i know it was a project trying join my friends for gaming it was a joke.Bluray is a joke i have seen the movies 1080p over the new zune system and they look as good as bluray on my over 50" elite.Wifi sucks i always hard wire when it comes to gaming you dont take chances on your connection if your a serious gamer.The ps3 menu is a mess text text text and more text menus of text.Home is a joke everyone knows it its a poor excuse no better than a ripoff of all the moronic interbet has to offer join in to watch virtual charecters dance while 40 year old men chase fake 18 year old girls.And even there its a pain in the ass to chat you gotta preety much text everthing to be sociable.
Heres how the real experience goes for the real console system.
Boot up 360 and theres all my friends quickly invite to a party no matter what there playing.We all agree upon a game while there still playing what there playing i then click one button invite em all and we are gaming.
|
i get that the 360 online is better, but psn does not "suck" for any reason....wifi does not suck, most people use it as its better than having a 100foot cable go through the house....just because psn is not up to par with xbl does not mean you have to go around trolling, go on some other site to do that.
|
Im not trolling im correcting there is a difference.Example being it was stated that 360 didnt have games that supported more than 25 players i corrected that.The rest is opinion of which im enititled to.Are you saying that im not entitled to my own opinion?
As for running the 100 ft cable its simple move your router.Now a days people use high speed cable based connections the 360 goes where the tv is doesn it?There being a cable line there use a splitter and if your computer is elsewhere use wireless on the computer.After all your not going to be doing anything on your computer as demanding as gaming is on a connection.If you game on your pc well then you can choose which is more important live gaming or pc gaming or just move your pc to the same room.I never game over wireless its the wort decision you can make.
|
when you say something "sucks" or is a "joke thats trolling, now saying that the online is not as good as 360 sounds better...oh and also, blueray is the future, like it or not, thats a big problem with HDDVD is that the 360 disk format does not have enough space to hold longer/better looking games....thats the reason why the 360 will never have uncharted or mgs4...so blueray does not suck, it only holds like 4 times the data dvd does....btw my own computer uses a wireless connection with a router and it is fine....
