WilliamWatts on 11 January 2010
I don't see it.
I mean:
1st console powerful but expensive.
2nd console powerful but too cheap.
3rd console probably just right.
Or:
1st console derivative.
2nd console iterative.
3rd console innovative (natal 2.0?)
Or:
1st console unprofitable.
2nd console break even.
3rd console profitable???
Microsoft seems to live by the rule of 3. Windows 3.0, Dos 3.0 etc in that every third version is their biggest winner.
Halo 1, 2 then 3. Then Halo Wars, ODST then Reach. Also Direct X 9 was the big release on that front as well. I prefer Star Trek though as I don't have to wait as long for good releases as its all about the even numbers. 
