Jojo51 said: Your example isn't a good comparaison. The difference between Dragon Age Origins PS3 VS X360 a just insignifiant. Eurogamers even said that the versions are equal. Bayonetta X360 run at 60 FPS, the PS3 version 30 FPS, and I wil not speak about the texture and light effect rendering... If X360 players are more interested by Dragons Age than the PS3 owner, it can be due the lack of new games provided to their console... Just compare the number of good game edited on PS3 during the last 6 months and you will understand why Dragon Age Origins doesn't appear has a first choice for PS3 gamers.
In the case of Bayonetta, the PS3 port is really a crap compared to the lead one ! And you cannot blam player that prefere to wait and buy it cheaper, just because they do not want to encourage this kind of nonsense (crapy port) ! And to finish with your bad example, despite is inferiority, the PS3 version has currently sold more than twice the X360 version. You can see now how your argument about the "smart' of the X360 players is absurd ! |
Im going to take it this post is towards me from my post? Well i never posted an example so maybe its not towards me? You say the 360 lacked new games in the last 6 months? I guess (exclusives) Forza 3, L4D2, Halo ODST were nothing.
And what PS3 version sold twice more than the 360 version? Bayonetta? I havent seen any numbers so please link me.
My "argument about the smart of 360" was just a fun joke yet could have a little truth behind it =D. However jokingly in my head to make up the difference in Dragon Age sales of both versions, the other PS3 owners that didnt want Dragon Age went and bought Demon's Souls instead lol