V-r0cK said:
ils411 said:
V-r0cK said:
There are actually some PS3-only owners that refuse to buy the game for the simple reason that its inferior to the 360. Im playing Bayonetta currently on my PS3 and its still definately worth it.
If those PS3-only owners that will rather wait to get this game cheap but will still eventually get it then good for you. Those that simply wont pick it up ever then its really your loss, cause they'll really be missing out on one of the best hack n' slack this gen.
Bayonetta is a great game to start the new year if those are still waiting for the March games.
|
I can understand why some people will opt not to buy it as some sort of a protest against SEGA. But IMO, it wasn't SEGA's intention to make an inferior port. If anything, I believe they were trying to make it as equal as possible. SEGA wouldn't want to tarnish its reputation by intentionally making the PS3 version inferior. If anything, it would hurt SEGA also as other companies would think twice before enlisting SEGA's services to port their games. This would mean loss of business opportunities for them.
I think what happend was SEGA ran out of time and or money and had to go ahead and launch the game as it is.
But to not buy it just because its 360 counter part is a bit better is a bit silly. Why deprive yourself of expriencing or playing a good game? just becuase some elses is better? reminds me of how children think. kinda like "hey, your balloon is slightly bigger than mine! i dont want my balloon anymore!"
If all else fails, we can always say to ourselves while playing our PS3 version of bayonetta "Dragon age origin is better on PS3 so is darksiders :P".
|
lol nice analogy, so true its childish. Funny fact is although Dragon Age is better on PS3, Dragon Age sold like +500k more on 360 than on PS3. Wouldnt be surprised if the same happens with Darksiders. This just tells me that 360 owners are smarter to not pass up on a good game just cause they have the more "inferior" version. 
|
Your example isn't a good comparaison. The difference between Dragon Age Origins PS3 VS X360 a just insignifiant. Eurogamers even said that the versions are equal. Bayonetta X360 run at 60 FPS, the PS3 version 30 FPS, and I wil not speak about the texture and light effect rendering... 
If X360 players are more interested by Dragons Age than the PS3 owner, it can be due the lack of new games provided to their console... Just compare the number of good game edited on PS3 during the last 6 months and you will understand why Dragon Age Origins doesn't appear has a first choice for PS3 gamers. 
In the case of Bayonetta, the PS3 port is really a crap compared to the lead one ! And you cannot blam player that prefere to wait and buy it cheaper, just because they do not want to encourage this kind of nonsense (crapy port) ! And to finish with your bad example, despite is inferiority, the PS3 version has currently sold more than twice the X360 version. You can see now how your argument about the "smart' of the X360 players is absurd !
