ils411 said:
I can understand why some people will opt not to buy it as some sort of a protest against SEGA. But IMO, it wasn't SEGA's intention to make an inferior port. If anything, I believe they were trying to make it as equal as possible. SEGA wouldn't want to tarnish its reputation by intentionally making the PS3 version inferior. If anything, it would hurt SEGA also as other companies would think twice before enlisting SEGA's services to port their games. This would mean loss of business opportunities for them. I think what happend was SEGA ran out of time and or money and had to go ahead and launch the game as it is. But to not buy it just because its 360 counter part is a bit better is a bit silly. Why deprive yourself of expriencing or playing a good game? just becuase some elses is better? reminds me of how children think. kinda like "hey, your balloon is slightly bigger than mine! i dont want my balloon anymore!" If all else fails, we can always say to ourselves while playing our PS3 version of bayonetta "Dragon age origin is better on PS3 so is darksiders :P". |
lol nice analogy, so true its childish. Funny fact is although Dragon Age is better on PS3, Dragon Age sold like +500k more on 360 than on PS3. Wouldnt be surprised if the same happens with Darksiders. This just tells me that 360 owners are smarter to not pass up on a good game just cause they have the more "inferior" version.