| V-r0cK said: There are actually some PS3-only owners that refuse to buy the game for the simple reason that its inferior to the 360. Im playing Bayonetta currently on my PS3 and its still definately worth it. If those PS3-only owners that will rather wait to get this game cheap but will still eventually get it then good for you. Those that simply wont pick it up ever then its really your loss, cause they'll really be missing out on one of the best hack n' slack this gen. Bayonetta is a great game to start the new year if those are still waiting for the March games. |
I can understand why some people will opt not to buy it as some sort of a protest against SEGA. But IMO, it wasn't SEGA's intention to make an inferior port. If anything, I believe they were trying to make it as equal as possible. SEGA wouldn't want to tarnish its reputation by intentionally making the PS3 version inferior. If anything, it would hurt SEGA also as other companies would think twice before enlisting SEGA's services to port their games. This would mean loss of business opportunities for them.
I think what happend was SEGA ran out of time and or money and had to go ahead and launch the game as it is.
But to not buy it just because its 360 counter part is a bit better is a bit silly. Why deprive yourself of expriencing or playing a good game? just becuase some elses is better? reminds me of how children think. kinda like "hey, your balloon is slightly bigger than mine! i dont want my balloon anymore!"
If all else fails, we can always say to ourselves while playing our PS3 version of bayonetta "Dragon age origin is better on PS3 so is darksiders :P".
