CGI-Quality said:
tjallern said:
CGI-Quality said:
tjallern said:
the 360 has shown no signs of topping the PS3 in graphics. it has even been 1,5 year longer on the market. and we all know that usually the longer into the console cycle = better graphics. so in my opinion we can exclude all 360 games right now. PS3 games will take this easy, mark my words. GOW3 is said to "shit" all over UC2 and the 360 hasn't even shown anything close to even this game..
Hard to say which PS3 game though, I would have to go with GOW3, The Last Guardian or GT5. But since GT5 is a racing game, it is kind of bound to have amazing graphics anyways
|
While I agree that the 360 is behind on the visual front, not necessarily a fault of the specs, I can't agree that the 360 won't at least continue to compete. Beyond that, IMO does it really have to compete? Look at what is being provided for it in 2010:
- Mass Effect 2
- Alan Wake
- Splinter Cell: Conviction
- Halo: Reach
- Fable III
- Metro 2033
Even if none of those touch games on the PS3 visually, which isn't necessarily true IMO, I don't see the big deal. They'll satisfy their fanbase and show that the 360 is capable of graphically appealing games.
|
Of course ^^ Great graphics does not = great games! so I have no problem saying that those 360 games will be great games. But since this thread was about amazing graphics, I don't see any need to bring any 360 games to the discussion. the 360 games can have great art-style though and of course be graphically appealing, but mind blowing, new generation-defining graphics? A BIG NO. That's for the PS3 games to handle. PS3 games are the games that are pushing console graphics this generation and last generation it was XBOX.
|
Again, I agree that the PS3 currently has the edge. I just heavily disagree with the highlighted.
|
It's ok! =p Opinions are opinions! How boring would it be in this world if we all agreed! opinions leads to discussions, and discussions are in many cases (or at least some) what leads to the best results!
