By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
radiantshadow92 said:
Squilliam said:
radiantshadow92 said:

i am so not gonna get this game, why should i pay the same 60$ as an xbox360 owner for the same exact game, but with a much less experience...

What would you do if you found out after you bought a game that they had reduced the PS3 version significantly because of people like you who don't buy games when they feel theres an inferior version?

i would be angry cause i bought the inferior version >_>....i dont see where youre going with this

What im asking is how would you feel if you were forced to play a version of a game which is inferior to its potential because the developers decided it was easier to cut the PS3 version down to the Xbox 360 versions level than it was to bring each up to the same high level. Its easier to gimp the better version than it is to improve the weaker one. So for example if Call of Duty 7 could run at 720P on the PS3 but they kept it at 600P deliberately because the Xbox 360 couldn't match it and therefore the graphics looked less crisp. Alternatively they didn't give PS3 owners 24 player online because the Xbox 360 could only do 18.

Essentially the more people refuse to play games which show signs of being different and the more stink they put out the less you'll see games that use the PS3s distinct advantages, but with the advantages come disadvantages so of course you'll occasionally see a game which the Xbox 360 excels at that the PS3 does not, like this game.



Tease.