Kasz216 said:
Lolcislaw said:
Kasz216 said:
morenoingrato said: they're basically saying: PS360 will win in 2010 |
Not so much.
They're saying it's easiser for them to work on the PS360.
You just need to largely make better looking PS2 games.
It's more expensive that way... but Capcom can't figure out what Wii gamers want. So may as well go for the high expense, low reward products, since Capcom has more then enough IP's to play the rising development cost game.
|
I think Capcom knows what Wii gamers want, cause i dont really think that they are much different then those on HD systems, but they wont deliver those products on the Wii (everyone knows that games like RE , SF etc. etc. would sell as well as on the HD consoles) instead they are releasing titles like DC or Spyborgs too fund their other projects.
At least they got MH III and Tatsunoko vs. Capcom which look like they have as much production value like HD consoles.
It annoys me when companies complain, without even seriously trying.
|
You think Capcom knows what Wii gamers want, yet refuses to release it, even though if it did it would lead to far greater profits then their HD offerins?
That seems illogical.
Those projects may be what Wii owners want... but i'd argue that either way Capcom doesn't know that... as otherwise there is no explination for not executing such titles. I mean they have plenty of "Wii friendly" titles that instead often end up on the digital download offerings.
|
I think looking at Resident Evil 4 Wii edition, capcom knows it well. They have guaranteed sales on HD consoles for their big "badass" titles, and they can deliver a certain vision they have for them, push the graphics etc. etc. , its their reasonable decision.
Plus development of RE 5, SF IV started probably long before people realised that Wii will be such a runaway success, and after investing a lot of money in the HD development, they will try to get that money back on that market.