arsenicazure said:
JaggedSac said:
arsenicazure said:
JaggedSac said:
arsenicazure said:
I dont think at this point MS is gonna prod their already displeased userbase with hardware revision(RAM et al).. natal should be an interesting idea.. but its a lot like the wii is to the gamecube.. a newer means of input rather than a hardware overhaul. |
The 360 userbase is displeased?
|
totally.. the 360 is a pretty bareboned packaged.. no wifi, no HDD in the arcade, expensive addons.. u get the drift.. I dont think people would be willing to make the shift to an entirely new SKU at this point. And lets not even talk about how displeased Rrod owners are.. I wouldnt wanna get anything new from MS at this point unless its version 2.0
|
Comprehensive study you have there. Seems like they are pretty pleased to me, gobbling up new games left and right. But that would be me just making a baseless claim. Or perhaps my claim has at least a little bit of base to it?
|
Yes.. gobbling games.. not consoles.. n especially not the same console twice( thank you RROD) or a third time(new SKU)...If MS dont wanna end up like SEGA they better not bother upgrading the 360 innards at this point. I'll gladly ditch them if they did. You have an interesting idea- and it would defntly boost performance, but my point is simply that no consumer at this point would upgrade their 360- sure a $79-99 natal addon is do-able but do MS really wanna piss off previous 360 owners with faster 360 hardware.
|
im a 360 oner since june 10 2008 and i want slight hardware upgrades while we wait 3 or 4 more years for the next generation
Essay Pro