| Slimebeast said: ^ So if the argument of being there first doesn't work, what does it matter in this case? It doesn't matter in the case of Israel, because Israel and the Jews are there already. So if you say "We can argue that the land should never have been taken off them in the first place but the fact is it was and that can't be undone now." it means the current Israel should be accepted, right? Because the fact is that the Jews control Israel, the West Bank and Jerusalem and that can't be undone now, right? |
Broadly speaking yes, sorry I actually meant to clarify that in my post. It would be ridiculous now to suggest that Isreal should not exist or that the Jewish people should have to move. Although expanding settlements into contentious areas should stop. However, a dimplomatic solution needs to be found between Isreal and Palastine and the only way that may be achieved could rely on powersharing in Jerusalem or concessions in other land.
Essay Pro