Worldwide up

[slowmo]

The agenda comment wasn't referenced to you.

I stand by my point the original poster I quoted was incorrect, I provided you and him if h e reads this, the required evidence to dispute the claim.

You quoted me this time and I responded with the link. I don't understand why you've making such a meal of going on about number of sources and what we should believe. I could perhaps have put the link in my original response and avoided you quoting me and in future I will probably do so when this issue occurs.

Whenever you enter a debate on a subject you should always fully understand what you're discussing imo, by not possessing the full facts on the ban number he shouldn't have mentioned it like you say.


Finally if you go around with the attitude of assuming everything you read is true then you're a propoganda machine's dream come true, if you're mad enough to run with a unconfirmed rumour as fact then expect to fall flat on your face occasionally. This last paragraph is generic and not aimed at you in particular I'll add though CGI.