| -ku- said: You guys will be dissapointed with the beta I know I was the two times I played it last month or november. TBH though the plus, it's better then CODMW2 but worse than BC2beta or KZ2 |
I dunno, some people do not seem to like it - others do. MAG graphically is not near as good as KZ2, but its balanced a lot better. MAG plays slightly slower, and has more firefights. Rocket launcher does not have a lot of effect on infantry, etc. MAG made sure to take out all the cheese. No one shot sniper kills unless its a headshot etc. MAG is for people who like fighting battles, and trying to take or defend positions.
KZ2 is great, and plays well, but still alot of cheese IMO. KZ2 has some really good fights, I just think MAG is ending up with a lot better balance geared towards gritty squad level engagements.
MW2 is not even in the same league as the other FPS being discussed.
BF:BC2 ... I think the engine is very good, and was very encouraged by the beta. I want to see more game modes, and how the BC game evolves between now and release, and the maps. I did not like the game mode for the Beta very much, though I liked the game. I would have preferred for the opposing team to take back the most recently captured points for example, for a more see-saw game.
I do think MAG could have done the 256 player map/mode a bit better, honestly my favorite is the 64 man. Not because of the number of players, but just because those maps flowed and played best, except for the Raven home map for the 128 mode.
Essay Pro