Khuutra said:
They're similar in that they're useful for off-the-cuff comparisons or contrasts, but the mechanics of them are very different. "A hill is to down as a Wii is to sales" doesn't make any sense under the analogy system. You mean to say "The Wii has scaled the mountain and is now destined to go down the other side," which is - of course - a metaphor. For analogies you need more literal comparisons, articularly in the way the things being compared can be quantified. I'm not going to argue with you as if a picture of twin mountain peaks is appropriately representative of hardware sales trends for video game consoles, the idea is absurd.
|
Well, like I said it may not make sense to you. Thats not my problem.