MaxwellGT2000 said:
DaBuddahN said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
DaBuddahN said:
No, this is no final nail is any coffin. Like it was pointed out before, since the number of games jarrod is listing is small (2) for the Wii, the average is going to be very high! It's basic mathematics. The fact that they PS3 and 360 can average 450k copies between 8 different titles, all which haven't been released in all territories is great!
To people who still have difficulty understanding what I'm saying... what average is bigger? 10/2 or 20/5?
Jarrod's averages are skewed. =/ It's like if he put all the other mature titles that have bombed on the Wii, the avergae would go down. Although, you might have RE4 to counter that.
|
Actually you said 2... yeah you didn't even read it did you? And the point of the argument there is that M rated games don't sell on Wii and if the Wii games that are there DO sell, while the PS3/360 games DONT... its just proving that M rated games has the potential to not sell on PS3/360 just as much as the Wii, and the fact of the matter is SEGA talked about moving to another console because those M rated games that didn't break even on PS3/360 was hurting them as a business. So really I don't see your leg to stand on here.
|
Some M titles have sold well on the Wii, no doubt, but taking the ones that have sold the best and then "averaging" them out is wrong,
|
Those ARE the M rated titles, not just the ones that sold well >_> *sigh*
|
OH! >_> I thought he was taking only House of the Dead games into consideration.
Essay Pro