| mibuokami said: With regards to the second, I would like to reiterate that we have seen no live interactive demo of either Crysis 2 or Rage running on the 360 (only a tech demo of the former and nothing of the later), so there is no evidence that either game will match or beat Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 at this stage. |
Early tech-demos of both, of which have both been shown on 360 have already superceded them.
| mibuokami said:
But even if Crysis / Rage did beat the above mention title graphically, what's to stop Sony from taking back the crown with another first party exclusive? |
Naughty Dog already confirming they've maxed out the PS3 and are only reliant on optimisations and Crysis 2 looks like a generation beyond it.
| mibuokami said:
But even if Crysis / Rage did beat the above mention title graphically, what's to stop Sony from taking back the crown with another first party exclusive? |
Nothing...but they've shown nothing otherwise to contradict it, no videos, no demos, no games. If they did you'd have a point. Plus having their devs say they're maxed out on the system doesn't help...i've got Jak 2 & Jak 3 and there's not much of a tangible leap between them.
| mibuokami said:
Did Epic rested on its laurel when they produced Gears of War which they proudly proclaim was the limit of the 360? No they went and made Gears of War 2 which won many Best Graphic award in 2008. |
Uh, Epic already clarified that neither Gears of War maxed out the system, I think you're confusing announcements with negative spin by fanboys.
|
mibuokami said: But alas, it is in the future and I cannot make use of it as a source to justify why the PS3 is a superior hardware. It has yet to prove itself! So I'll use what I can and still remain justified. |
Well you could justify it if you had footage of such a game, like I am with Crysis 2. The only difference is is tangible, real and has a confirmed release, whereas you'd be just claiming a game would look better without seeing it.
|
mibuokami said: You're trying to advise me that 360 is a superior piece of hardware base on potential future products that have not proven themself, |
No, no, no, I'm questioning how one can justify that Cell & Blu-ray were provably beneficial - aside form things like 7.1 and higher def movies - when future products look to prove otherwise. I'm not saying the 360s better hardware for it (though I suspect C2 will run better on it given the statistics of cross platform games), but it's like saying Resistance 1 justified Cell, when compared to Modern Warfare (1) it looked naff.
