bimmylee said: "A peaceable solution would have been found more appealing." To whom? Israel? Unlikely. "They would have been more willing to compromise." How so? And why should they? They've done nothing illegal. The UN is the one who assisted them in becoming a nation (again) in the first place. And your apartheid analogy is very flawed. The motivation and historical context is entirely different here. Your comments have exposed how uneducated you are in terms of world news. Israel is currently in a formal state of war with at least two nations (Syria and Lebanon), if not more. Iran doesn't "accept the existence of the state." Jordan is working to restore ties with Hamas, the author of these quotes. If you really believe such a ridiculous thing, then your anti-Israel bias has been made clear here, and I don't intend to argue further. |
I'll keep it simple.
Israel spend much money on security
Israel get much money given to them as aid
If Israel no get money they can't pay for all guards everywhere
Oh no what Israel do?
I know! Israel make compromise to ensure peace.
And no im not talking about with neighbours, im talking about not being able to guard settlements, keep aggressive road blocks etc which antagonise the palestinians. Whether or not theres a historic context or not, there are palestinians alive today who now have jewish people living in houses they hold titles to.
Tease.