| jneul said: You know you can tell it's a direct GOW ripoff without even playing on the Demo, and your right about the graphics, they really are bad. None the less some sad people will try and claim it is better than GOW just because it is on XBOX as well. |
Definitely agree and this will become another "prototype vs infamous" argument. Jesus people just have to let it go. When we PS3 fans have a mouth-watering exclusive deal with it. You don't see us crying that the 360 has the Halo franchise that is good in it's own right. We also give credit to Gears of War which revolutionized TPS and refined the cover system. DMC and GOW are VERY different outside of being in that action genre, nothing else is the same at all. DMC is a stylish action type that is heavy on projectile usage. GOW is melee centric (minor projectile usage) with a more gore ugly side of battle portrayed. GOW is more massive in scale as well in all aspects. The only game in the DMC series I would ever think about pitting against GOW would be DMC3 best in series and not made by Hideki (creator of viewtiful joe and bayonetta). The only reason some people even attempt to compare GOW to DMC as well is because DMC4 is on the 360, or else they wouldn't even bother with that. They would probably compare it to Ninja Gaiden lol. Seriously let it rest, PS3 has a winner franchise and that's that. DI is nothing but a ripoff based on the demo impressions and doesn't deserve to hold the title of such a fine piece of literature.
Make games, not war (that goes for ridiculous fanboys)
I may be the next Maelstorm or not, you be the judge http://videogamesgrow.blogspot.com/ hopefully I can be more of an asset than a fanboy to VGC hehe.
