Will the Wii pass the GCN in # of AAA titles?

[Kenryoku_Maxis]

Seece said:

Kenryoku_Maxis said:

Seece said:

 

didn't ask you to give me a full response, but twisting what I say is just stupid. I couldn't be bothered to read through all that drivel, sorry.

Someone who is telling someone else not to be condescending and trying to play the 'I won't be bothered to argue with you until you quit being a jerk' card should follow his own rules when talking to others.  The minute you tell someone 'I didn't even read what you said because its worthless', yeah, you're a condescending jerk who thinks his opinion is better than everyone else and is close minded to anyone elses opinion but yourself.

Which is what I was alluding to with my points while STILL being on topic.  Which is little more than I can say for you and your veiled insults and while completely ignoring my points and then crying about me 'twisting your words'. 

I didn't say it was worthless I said it was drivel. I also don't think my opinion is any bette/stronger w/e than anyone elses thank you very much. Nor did I insult anyone. Unlike you, which I suggest you stop because it's frowned upon and you won't last long calling people jerks I assure you. I don't need to reply to all your points, there is no code of conduct when replying to people on how much of the post you need to reply to, I chose to reply to on piece (you comparing wii to ps2 in terms of software) and you then twisted it.

Now who's twisting words.  For your first actual answering of one of my points, you twisted mine.  I didn't say the PS2 and the Wii have competely matching software as you just implied.  I said the PS2 was the 'least powerful graphically of its generation' (like the Wii) and had 'tons of shovelware' (like the Wii).  And I said that multiple of the games that the PS2 got scored over 90 on metacritic were games that Wii are getting downscored on, such as puzzle, mini-game and casual titles.  Three distinct points that have nothing to do with EITHER the points you keep trying to accuse me of making or the one you are making up now.  One of them is even a comparison of hardware.

If you continue to insist the discussion is about the PERSON making the argument, it isn't going to go anywhere.  But now that we're at least back to the actual points, maybe we can get somewhere.

killeryoshis said:

-ku- said:

Omega_Phazon_Pirate. said:
I consider NSMBW an AAA title yet it just lacks below 90 because of some sour whiny reviewers.

Honestly the game doesnt even feel better then ratchet and clank its too conservative nothing new.

 

How come all other sequel that add so little to the genre get lower scores than their predescessors but god forbid the Leading Franchise on the Nintendo systems not be an exception

@green
Too consturtive,Nouthing new? Nouthing new?!? Are you telling me that NSMBW got low scores for doing nouthing new?
%$#&$^$! Tell me at all of the GC titles which actually do new things? What other sequals do new things tell us

New Super Mario Bros Wii was a very VERY good game.  But unlike the Mario games that came before it, even New Super Mario Bros on the DS, it didn't really do that much new.  The powers were basically rehashed, the levels were all remixed, the concept and even the basic game premise was about 'nostalgia'.  None of that is bad.  Heck, the game is going to sell 15 million BECAUSE of this.  But compared to something like Mario 3, Mario World or heck, Mario Galaxy, it didn't do that much 'new' stuff.  The only new things are probably the co-op mode, the few added technical aspects (like the levels of light in some levels and added control of Mario) and the Penguin Suit.

And really now, New Super Mario Bros Wii got plenty of good scores.  Much higher than other games on the Wii.  And there's plenty of other games on the GameCube that did original things.  Metroid Prime, Animal Crossing, Pikmin, Resident Evil 4, Mario Sunshine, Mario RPG: Thousand-Year Door, Wind Waker, Smash Bros Melee, etc...