By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dahuman on 31 December 2009
Edit Thread
RAZurrection said:
MikeB said:
@ RAZurrection

It seems nomatter how often developers clarify their comments, certain fans hold onto their misbelieves...

Well that article is only 2 days old, I hadn't seen it yet.

Still good news right? Since Crytek have seemingly found the limits to the Cell, then assuredly there are no excuses for Crysis 2 to look the same as the 360 version of Crysis 2, let alone worse.

dahuman said:

dood, processing at 100% is not optimized to 100%, the second one is nearly impossible these days even on a Nintendo DS.

If it's applicable to every system, then I'm not sure what needs to be said about it. Infinite optimisation as long as you have the time, but you can't turn a DS into a 360 no matter how long the development.

CGI-Quality said:

Which has nothing to do with anything.

Oh I just wondered if you were aware they had downgraded it again since I can see you are a fan.

CGI-Quality said:

As for being attacked, spare me. Nobody attacked you.

Uh you basically lashed out because I suspect you are insecure.

dahuman said:

enhance+optimize, enhance is adding new features, optimize will lead to enhancements, which will result in even better looking games, this is the basics of making games on consoles no matter which one you are working on.

Common sense, another 2 years of development yields slightly better results. But surely you realise also that there comes a point, which has come and gone where improvements become too small to be worth the trouble. Diminishing returns.

dahuman said:

yeah, still higher potential than the 360 though, even without optimizing atm, the PS3 demo of CE3 looked quiet a bit more impressive than the 360 one tbh, I really really want to see the PC one, the PC version would be so much more superior haha.

Well I don't know what footage you saw I was more referring to:

1) The Fact they show twice as much 360 footage as ps3 footage

2) Digital Foundry declared the most intensive footage was on 360, because it could run it better

3) Cevat Yerli saying the 360 would be better on the graphics as the PS3 was "the lowest denominator for a lot of people"

MikeB said:

Having to support the 360 will probably lead to sacrifices. For example they may have wanted more onscreen activity, something the PS3 is technically capable of providing. But of course you can't have such huge game design differences between versions. Therefor I think it's more likely it's going to be more minor differences like an extra special effect here or there.

According to this, it was only a recent breakthrough that stopped the PS3 from compromising the console release full stop.

 

Damn!

I don't think we are at the part where we will see diminishing returns from optimizing 360 or PS3 code yet, especially not the PS3 since cell is a fuckfest to code for.

 

1.) where was the PC footage? PC version must run like shit compared to the consoles so they can't show it =P

2.) digital foundry.... lol.....

3.) to be fair, this is a better statement from gamasutra, they are aiming for equal, he never said the 360 would have better graphics.


What would you cite as the major performance differences between PS3 and 360? I’ve heard a lot of opinions.

CY: I mean essentially the game we run is about the same. Probably one’s stronger on the GPU side, one’s stronger on the CPU side, so depending on what you’re doing where, the PS3 does perform here sometimes better, the 360 performs other things better, but overall by the time the game ships it’ll be absolutely the same.

also, look at their progress, I think what they are aiming for is reasonable at this point from about 2 months ago(the parts where it doesn't say either system were prolly PC footage:)

 

of course, nothing can top this shit: