Fire Emblem: RD Vs Valkyria Chronicles

[Kasz216]

naznatips said:

Kasz216 said:
As for which is the better game.

It really depends on how you define "better."

Radiant Dawn is the better game, but it comes from a long line of Fire Emblem games and doesn't change much.

Valkria Chronicles copies a style that only had one SRPG before it. (that no one has played but me apparently.)


The newest Madden is obviously better then past ones but is seen less favorably due to little innovation.

I'm guessing you mean Zeonic Front. Check my profile I own it. You're correct that it copied the real-time damage while moving feature from Zeonic Front... but obviously things are a lot more fleshed out in VC.

As for your VC comments: enemies don't use all their command points because you are playing on normal, but they also start with a lot more than you do and a lot more troops, all of which are as strong as yours unless you are majorly overleveled.

As for the tactics comment, tactics refers to your actual actions in movement, rather than your grand overall strategy, and if you can't see how there aren't more tactics in VC's movement and use of terrain, cover, group fire, and real-time damage, then you are way beyond my help.

Nope.  Future Tactics.

 

Though I would disagree with yoru definition of "Tactics".

 

I would view tactics as "amount of ways you have to approach battles."

Which tends to be the weakspot of most SRPGs oddly... strategy.