| invetedlotus123 said: 60 Hz lcd have terrible dinamic resolution. The only true 1080p displays are the 240Hz LCD(and LED) and the 600Hz plasmas. So, even with 1080p source and a 60hz 1080p lcd you most likely watch 350p in practice, and using a 720p lcd you have the same dinamic resolutionas using a 1080p, for 60hz lcd there isn't much why get a full hd unless the difference of price is pretty minimal. Look this site test(much better than cnet) www.hdtvtest.co.uk |
This is complete nonsense, the source material is generally 24fps for Bu-ray and at best 60Hz for anything else. A 240Hz display will either repeat each frame, in which case it doesn't make any difference or add interpolated frames in which case you are certainly not adding resolution but will add lag to games or make it look fake and rubbish for movies. The main thing to benefit from 1080p is a big enough screen and to sit close enough. The refresh rate has nothing to do with resolution, what you are probably thinking about is motion blur caused by the displays reponse time and the sample and hold method. For movies in particular some blur is in the source material itself. One way some displays can get around this is to insert darkened frames, but this is at the expense of much reduced brightness and contrast and flicker is often visible.
