By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DOATS1 on 26 November 2007
Edit Thread
ssj12 said:
Ickalanda said:
ssj12 said:
Ickalanda said:
lightbleeder said:
ssj12 said:
 

thanks for answering that part

@NJ5 - the space will come in handy when we get to the super-HD levels (1440p+). Also it will be used for PC storage.


Why do we need super-HD levels? Is the eye capable of noticing the difference of 1080p and 1440p on a 50" HDTV??


Actually the larger the TV the more noticeable the resolution and you can notice the difference on a 19" monitor for your PC so in the larger scale it will be even more noticeable.


no, I figure the more pixels there are the smaller the details they can fit. Just like PC's. Remember original resolution was like 640 x 480 for a 15.4" screen. Now laptop screens that are 15.4 are up to 1680 x 1050. Its the same thing with a 52" TV the higher the resolution (and number od pixels) the more detail will be able to be put and will be noticable.


Not sure if this was targeted at me but thats what I was talking about.  Because the guy said will you even be able to notice the difference on a 50" HD TV and I said well you can notice it on a PC Monitor and since a 50" TV is much larger than my 19" monitor the pixels will be bigger and so the pixels shrinking in size will be noticeable.


 ya.. misread what you said..

 

could you imaging a TV with a 5k+ resolution? my god that would be beautiful. 


remember though, the ps3 only has a 2x bd-rom drive, so movies that require over 72mbps a second will not be compatible with the ps3, so maybe 200gb blu-ray discs are a bad idea, for movies at least.