Kasz216 said:
Netyaroze said:
@kasz216
Ok no proof but atleast some indication. But I still think that a government like USA shouldnt be tricked by anyone. Maybe the CIA is not as powerful as I thought. But even if he made it seem that he had Weapons of Massdestruction why the hell they just care in Iraq ? North Korea has them and nothing happens.
The USA said yes to the rules of the UN but the UN said there is not enough evidence for a war but the USA proced further. And even the US citizens think it was a mistake. And the USA is the leading Country in the world and want to stand for freedom democrazy and human rights. They are ofcourse measured completly different then a country like Iraq . They are the leader and have responsibilitys and they have to be BETTER then the rest of the world. The US superiority was always a moralic superirority atleast until the Vietnam war.
I think what vlad meant it was basically a terrorism against UK it was per definition really terrorism even if the motivation was another one.
I obviously dont agree with such a statement but i think Iraq war was a huge mistake and USA will have to pay long enough for it because it heated on terrorism and not calmed down it.
Had the US some real evidence for the war or was it just hearsay. Had they pictures from satelittes or from agents ?
And its the same you said why the hell I want a proof that bush is innocent. But the USA had no real proof that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. They made a psyhcological profil from hitler and were able to predict some actions they made this for saddam hussein too but why the hell so they could have known he would make up such a shit to defend his country.
|
Now your just being ridiculious.
It's fairly obvious you don't want an hoenst discussion and just want to believe what you want to beleive.
As for North Korea... they actually did care... they tried to handle things diplomatically... and look how that ended. Where was the UN on that one.
I was against the war in Iraq when it was planned. It still doesn't give people the right to make up bullshit excuses like "he made it up!" for apparently no reason.
|
Ok lets try to recapitulate.
1:
Do you agree with me that Bushs decision was based on wrong Informations ?
If no explain me why.
Do you agree that the wrong informations where delievered by the CIA ?
If no explain me why
Do you agree that it was a mistake from the CIA that they delievered wrong information or from bush that he made a decison based on papers which had no real evidence.
This three things are the basic things for my argumentation everything else is opinion if such a mistake is allowed to happen in such aa delicate question which decides over thousend of lives (american and iraqi)
And to your last point I already said I used the wrong words i am obviously not a native speaker so I often have the wrong feeling for words which leds to misunderstandings.
Essay Pro