Pharaoh said:
ffirebrand_cloud said:
Actually, I think both sucked. I played MW2 for 5 hours or so with my brother, and was overwhelmed by the amount of camping going on. Seriously, it was just horrible. The game itself is good; the shooting is very fun and the amount of online options are great. But the developers really fucked up while designing the maps. Many of them are camping heaven.
Battlefield on the other hand, suffers from a shortage of players. The beta map is quite big for the amount of players, and the map design isn't that great. I only had fun in the town itself, but absolutely hated the bridge and russian stronghold. Also, I hated the fact that some rifles recoil far too much for my taste.
MW2 could have beaten KZ2 as my favorite multiplayer expirience, but sadly, camping has prevented that from happening. |
I'll let you keep running around getting a negative K/D ratio, while I get my nuke and end the game with 40+ kills and 2-3 deaths.
|
Wow lol. If you enyoy playing the game like that, let me say that you are ruining the expirience for many many people. The grenade tossing mechanic in that game is seriously flawed, and is the primary cause that people can camp so comfortably.
Anyways, i don't think that you are responding in a decent way. If you don't like the way I play a game, it's fine, but don't try to make me feel bad.
I won't criticize your way of playing, but please, don't criticize mine.
