Why does the Playstation 3 continue to receive poor ports?

[CommonMan]

ZenfoldorVGI said:

There is no generalized easy answer. In the case of Bayonetta, the developers were forced(or chose to) oursource the port. What we ended up with is one of the best action games ever made on the 360, and a lazy ass PS3 port.

Now, the developers obviously aren't lazy, or they couldn't put out the best action game so far released, and indeed in this instance, they didn't even do the port themselves.

Publishers just know that most gamers are ignorant, and what they buy has little to do with the quality of it, but instead the public perception.

Whining over lazy ports is kinda spoilt, if you ask me. You should be thanking the gaming gods that you even get the chance to play Bayonetta or FFXIII, instead of whining over longer loadtimes or lack of lossless audio. Let's not be fanboys, shall we? Attacking a company or a game because you think they didn't do a well enough job catering to your console, is simply that. If you don't like it, don't buy it, whining is lame, and flaming or insulting the developer is fanboyism. I'll tell you like PS3 fans would have told you 2 years ago. If you want to play the game, but the console. They're cheap, especially the 360, and it does have the definitive version of Bayonetta if nothing else.

I actually teared up a little reading this. You sir are a credit to gaming.