tarheel91 said:
Unless you're going to back up your argument, you're not really bringing anything to the discussion. You can't just say something as fact and expect everyone to believe you. You need evidence from the movie. Also, I didn't say it was the greatest film ever. I acknowledged the story telling wasn't as good as the visual experience, but I felt it was still very good. Thanks for putting words in my mouth. By contrast, Reasonable's posts are written in a much better manner. He makes claims, but he cites scenes, characters, and decisions from the movie to justify them (even if he's not taking everything into consideration ;) ). Film analysis doesn't work by getting a consensus of general opinions (i.e. a lot of people think it's good, so it must be good). You need to critically analyze the work, and make your argument. Again, your complaint about the length doesn't have any real merit because your complaint about story telling isn't backed up by any evidence. However, I will say that most of that extra time was spent developing the world, not the story (a lot of it goes to scenes like the one where Jake plays with those spiral plants, pats the light-up mushrooms, or feels the tentacle/branches of those ancestor trees; they're small, but they add up quickly). |
WoW...errr...I'm not sure why you're so combative. I started this thread, because I thought the movie was amazing, so I'm not getting how you're coming to the conclusion that I'm being over critical of the film. The intent was to have a in-depth discussing on the film, because I thought it was that special, not the same crap we get on games, with people fling insults over a freaking film. . I agreed with some of your points as to the visuals having a storytelling aspect, in making the phrase..."A picture is worth a thousand words" being accurate, and I thought the movie is amazing. For me, anybody who loves motion pictures should check out the movie for the sheer spectacle of it...I'll even give the movie a 9/10 overall and 10/10 for the visuals.
Wrt to the movie's length, it was an issue of the movie being too long...I had no problem with that, I felt that with that length, there could have been more focus of tying up many of the plot devices that Reasonable referred to. For example, why was Trudy the only marine who looked at this situation and wanted no part of it? Also, why was the Colonel the way he was...I'm sorry, but these are what makes film's great. The primary villain was a caricature of cliché dumb military types...
Analytically speaking, the ending was perhaps the only letdown for me. The planet was sentient, and unlike our world, there is a symbiotic link throughout the world, which was interconnected their the hair follicle thing. I just felt the ending was far too cliché...not that it was bad and terrible, or anything like that...just not profound. Abyss is one of my favorite movies, and it's my Favorite James Cameron film, and that movie had one of the best endings ever, imho.
So, please can we keep the discussion civil, and skip the face palming.