cloofoofoo said:
twesterm said:
Badassbab said:
Xoj said:
Burning Typhoon said:
NKAJ said:
why would they dileberatly make the graphics worse on ps3 just so it could be equal to xbox360? graphics are ment to get better not worse |
They did the same thing with Tekken 6... So, of course, the arcade makes both versions look like crap, and the arcade version is based on PS3 hardware.
Anyway, I wish they'd stop gimping PS3 ports... they've got no problem leaving the graphics as-is when it's the 360 with the better looking version. Oh well, I guess I could just stop buying even-numbered Tekken games.. But, as for this game, I'll need to wait and see what other people think before getting it.
|
i can confirm this :/.
|
The arcade version is based on PS3 hardware with more memory so they could improve the texture detail etc. In fact the 360 version runs at a higher resolution than the PS3 version with the motion blur switched off. Also VF5, SC4 and SF4 all look better than T6 Arcade and all three of those games are technically superior on the 360 (T6 is a two year old arcade game). To say they wanted to keep both versions equal and so watered down the PS3 version (which takes advantage of it's Blu Ray capability) is pure make believe.
|
Actually, the 360 has more texture memory than the PS3.
|
I thought he meant the arcade board thats based off the ps3 has more texture memory than ps3 or 360 and thats y the hompe port looks like it looks.Kinda like how naomi has double the main and vram compared to the dreamcast sort of situation.
On topic bout final fantasy,I recently purchased a slim bundle(3 games) But I told my wife the ps3 will be solely for exclusives and ALL multiplatform Ill get for the xbox.Any according to that article on the website the actually game content is around 8gb big,that shouldnt be too hard to spread on 3 discs.The only thing probably taking a hit on the x360 is audio and the pre-recorded cutscenes.
|
Whoops, he was, I fail at reading today. -_-
