twesterm said:
So are you saying it's pointless to look at reviews then? Why should I spend the money to play both versions rather than just read the words of the reviewer that has played both versions? It's obvious that one is better than the other, that's all this is about. I agree that arguing between a 0.1-0.3 difference isn't worthwhile, but this is a 1.3 point different which is significant enough to worry. |
No, I am saying the opposite. The reviewer has spent much more time with both versions of the game than anyone here has and yet some people are calling foul without playing both versions. I'll trust a reviewer (who interestingly enough is on IGN's PS3 team) over anybody here who hasn't played the game yet.









