Kasz216 said:
Really? Cause all of my updates download without needing to open IE. Though making it so patches can only go through their internet exploerer actually sounds like a security feature... further cementing the "vital part of the operating system." thing.
Also, complaing because most people wanted to use IE rather then download some shitty browser that was about equal to IE before Firefox came along isn't really a problem... so much as... well and obvious sitation? If everyone in the world starts using cars that don't run on gas and instead decide to use cars that run on a synthetic fuel that's healthier for the enviroment... well it'll be hard for me to blame a gas station for my old car. I'm not going to sue the makers of the new ultra popular fuel though. |
If you don't like automated patching and you want to be able to refuse some upgrades, you have to use IE. You can use another browser, but you must download the patches and apply them one at a time, without IE you lose the partially automated option.
And what you call "shitty browsers" were never as buggy as IE4, in a free market IE would have sunk with version 4 (*)
Edit: (*) as previous version basicly the old Mosaic with a few changes, but nothing special. And what computer magazines did, praising and advertising it in biased reviews when the version 4.0 they put on cover mounted CD's was unusable, it freezed the whole OS even just clicking on scrollbars, is simply shameful. Just as it's shameful how they helped Word and Office to crush its competitors, I remember those times, and Word 6, unlike Word 1 and 2, was shit, heavy, bloated shit, it deserved to be buried by Ami Pro and WordPerfect, just like Smartsuite and WordPerfect suite should have beaten, in a free market, at least some not well made versions of Office.







