Kasz216 on 19 December 2009
| WereKitten said: ^You gleefuly ignore the fact that the "one company" means about 95% of the OS market and that everything started because some competitors asked for the spotlight to be cast on MS' specific case, not on the general lack of a legislation. I do agree that better legislation is in order so that any company would be automatically subjected to the same restrictions, were they in a dominant position. But that doesn't make any less useful imposing those restrictions on 95% of the OS market in one swoop. And I hope you're conscious that proceedings against firms guilty of price-fixing or rigging often happen on a per-case basis because the legislation will always be outpaced by the economic and technical specifics. |
Actually it's more like 89%... and shrinking
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp
If 70% is your "barrier" for acceptable... you only have to wait like 6 years according to current trends.
