By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kantor said:
wholikeswood said:
Kantor said:
kowenicki said:
Kantor said:
wholikeswood said:

A metacritic of 87, a generous coop campaign and now the great value platinum price of £20, and you have the cheek to say it sold "way more than it deserved".

Unreal.

Shoddy graphics, derivative gameplay, removal of everything that made the original...original, and broken multiplayer, and you claim it sold less than it deserved? And considering I can get LBP for less than £20...

Funny that you mention Unreal, because UT3 is a much better game.

dont worry, he probably didnt mean it... he just saw a post by me and he automatically has to post the gainsay.

Yes, I suppose that's normal.

What isn't normal is that I'm agreeing with you.

It scares me.

Firstly, I didn't once say it sold "less than it deserved". I really hate it when people put words in my mouth instead of dealing with what I actually posted. I objected to the idea that it sold "way more than it deserved". I think it sold fairly.

Oh, and don't flatter yourself, Kowenicki. Really hate how if you're a PS3 fan on this site and you say that you particularly enjoy a PS3 exclusive, it must be for forum purposes - it couldn't possibly be that it's just one of my collection that I've got the most hours out of. Still, thanks for ganging up. Yawn.

There was a question mark.

I suppose it did sell fairly. Perhaps a little more than a game which ruins a perfectly good premise and makes the series a poor attempt at Halo/CoD deserves to.

Don't get me wrong: the series took a wrong direction with the second - I have better memories of the first - but there are still things worthy of merit in the second, especially the coop and some of the weapons (Splicer and sexier Auger, YES).