Kantor said:
wholikeswood said:
Kantor said:
kowenicki said:
Kantor said:
wholikeswood said:
A metacritic of 87, a generous coop campaign and now the great value platinum price of £20, and you have the cheek to say it sold "way more than it deserved".
Unreal.
|
Shoddy graphics, derivative gameplay, removal of everything that made the original...original, and broken multiplayer, and you claim it sold less than it deserved? And considering I can get LBP for less than £20...
Funny that you mention Unreal, because UT3 is a much better game.
|
dont worry, he probably didnt mean it... he just saw a post by me and he automatically has to post the gainsay.
|
Yes, I suppose that's normal.
What isn't normal is that I'm agreeing with you.
It scares me.
|
Firstly, I didn't once say it sold "less than it deserved". I really hate it when people put words in my mouth instead of dealing with what I actually posted. I objected to the idea that it sold "way more than it deserved". I think it sold fairly.
Oh, and don't flatter yourself, Kowenicki. Really hate how if you're a PS3 fan on this site and you say that you particularly enjoy a PS3 exclusive, it must be for forum purposes - it couldn't possibly be that it's just one of my collection that I've got the most hours out of. Still, thanks for ganging up. Yawn.
|
There was a question mark.
I suppose it did sell fairly. Perhaps a little more than a game which ruins a perfectly good premise and makes the series a poor attempt at Halo/CoD deserves to.
|
Don't get me wrong: the series took a wrong direction with the second - I have better memories of the first - but there are still things worthy of merit in the second, especially the coop and some of the weapons (Splicer and sexier Auger, YES).