Mr Khan on 15 December 2009
It should factor in as something akin to diplomatic immunity (which i know is only for diplomats, but the logic for that could be twisted towards this)
though i suppose the easier thing to do is just say, if it's a choice between getting your medicine and not going somewhere, just don't go, though i suppose that sounds like discrimination (like saying to someone in a wheelchair: if you can't go to the restaurant, don't). It's a murky proposal and it would be absolutely impossible to enforce, though it has merit.
Also, isn't the phrase "err on the side?" and not "air on the side?"
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
