1. You become upset when something you like is questioned. Yes. Very yes. Keeping in mind I'm originally from S. Florida, I think the Shaq acquisition was the slimiest thing the Heat have ever done. For some reason, I keep finding myself defending him, though. 2. You are intellectually dishonest. No. I may use some unfair tactics when arguing online once in a while, but when I'm arguing religion, politics, or video games, I make a point of taking the other person into account, no matter how much I disagree. 3. You resort to personal attacks during debate. Depends on your definition. I'll use personal information to make an attack... but it's almost always backed up with legitimate info, and if it's not, that usually means I'm posting at 3:00 in the morning again, and I'll regret it the next day. I say "no." 4. The defeat of your enemy is more rewarding than your victory. This is tough, because with so few players, usually the defeat of your enemy directly or indirectly contributes to your victory. The key word here is "more." That given, I'm pretty sure I can honestly say "no." 5. You bring nothing new to a conversation. Usually if I don't have anything to say, I don't say it. One of the aforementioned "unfair tactics" I use is to poke holes in other arguments more than provide an argument, myself. But they're logically thought-out holes. Eh, all that given, I'll say "maybe." 6. You are anti-fanboy. See #3. I take what everyone says into account, until they prove to me that I shouldn't. No on this one. Final score: 2/6 Hooray! I'm 1/3 fanboy!
