Gnizmo said:
Ah I see. Appeal to authority. Well I don't really have the time to argue against a logical fallacy. Well thats not true. I don't really have the energy. You don't have to address anything, it is true. However, your statements then lose all merit. Unless you can logically back them up there isn't much weight to it. es 3D and Natalesque gaming are the future. Its a matter of time before virtual reality gaming and holographic gaming are common. I'm a Computer Graphics Technology major and this is what we discuss and are focusing on. I know alot of you are close minded and believe games can only be played with a controller but unlike you there are creative minds who will create successful ways to play games without a classic controller.
A group of technophiles believe that the latest technology will be the next big thing. Shocking. The consumer is what dictates the next big thing ultimately. How do you compete against the most popular genres with untested and new ones? Going strictly into a Natalesque control schemes present a significant number of limitations as of right now. I don't know where this close minded thing comes from. It is odd how people keep repeating it. Who here has said Natal didn't open up a lot of interesting avenues in game development? |
I guess my main point it that you don't know that some or even all of the limitations haven't already been overcome. Neither can I say for certain that they ever will be. Until we see the finished product we can't condemn it to failure for limitations we can't be sure are even there. I actually get the feeling we're not that far apart on what we're arguing about here. I've had a really rough day, and I might have come off as cranky and mean, if so, I apologize.
