By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sanadawarrior said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
sanadawarrior said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
sanadawarrior said:
So what, if the man doesn't like the graphics he doesn't like em. If he only cared about stories or gameplay would he be a story whore or gameplay whore?

I should also reply to your second part. Graphics whores put how detailed they think the graphics should be over just about everything else, including the art direction, how discinct everything lookes, and other things that are still visually related. I know this because Twilight Princess overall had stronger graphics than Resident Evil 4, but because the art direction didn't go the detailed route, reviewers claimed the graphics weren't as good.


So what, if a person wants to play only games that have super detailed graphics because that is what they like should they not be allowed to do that and voice their displeasure when something doesn't measure up? Same for any other factor in a game for that matter.

That's not what he's doing. He's not telling us he would prefer the game like that (there would be clear language to state such a thing in his comments). He's telling us the game looks bad. Not to him, but looking bad objectively (hence the claim it can be confused for a magazine scan).

Actually he is claiming the screenshots look bad, which could be for other reasons other than the game itself looking bad.

I was actually thinking about that at first, but then the "these are proper screenshots" line.

The thing is that aside from the edges, those screenshots look like proper screenshots of other PSP games. No better, no worse. He's seeing something that's not there.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs