By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
elprincipe said:
famousringo said:
 

Sorry, next time I'll use facts that are more in line with your pre-conceived notions.

Do me a favour. The next time you demand that somebody "prove it," replace the language with "you can't prove it to me." Don't pretend that you can be reasoned with when you've already made up your mind.


Do me a favor: don't point out rankings by a supremely biased source as "proof" of something and then get upset when I don't accept them.


Do you have any evidence that the WHO is biased? According to Google, the only people who think the WHO is biased is the tobacco industry.

Let me guess, it's part of the UN, so it must hate the US. Is that the assumption you're making?

 Edit: Found one article from the National Review. Main criticism is the WHO continuing inefficient aid programs at the behest of NGOs.

 Still can't find anybody else doing broad comparisons of health care performance, though. I imagine that study about relative administration costs between US and Canadian systems didn't hold any truck with you, either.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.