vlad321 said:
Kasz216 said:
nightsurge said:
I call BS on these stories.
Consoles have been using P2P for years. I have used 4 different providers, including cable, DSL, and FiOS. I have gamed for hours and hours and hours on those different providers and I have been host on these Xbox games very often.
I never received any letters or complaints or anything.
I think some PC gamers are still a little sour and making up some BS.
And if any of you think that IWnet's P2P setup is better than MS's... you're tripping 
|
Did you miss my post right above yours?
There is also the possibility that Activision cheaped out on IW.Net and made most of the stuff that Microsoft and Playstation handle on a master server happen on the ISPs and/or just made the transfers much less efficent.
In short. There are tons of reasons why this would happen with MW2 and not with console gaming.
|
The master server thing would make a lot of sense.
|
What? Master server? I don't think you people have any idea what you are talking about when it comes to P2P networks, especially not the one that is the Xbox Live matchmaking system... Microsoft uses a whole field of servers to handle their matchmaking system. There is no way they could somehow take the matchmaking system process happen on ISP resources or something. The transfers would be the same amount of bandwidth usage regardless.
If anything, the PSN version of P2P and the PC one are probably almost identical. The PSN does not provide the matchmaking system to all games like Xbox Live does, so IW would have had to make a custom matchmaking system for them too. That's why of the console versions, the 360 one is the most flawless of the 2 when it comes to online.
