noname2200 said:
So I state that I don't think Malstrom should insult his readers, I state that I'm okay with this particular article, and you...take it that I'm accusing him of insulting his readers in this article? I'm sad to say that I appear to be more on the money with my last post than I thought! |
No, you've stated repeatedly that you do not like Maelstroms 'abrasive and hostile' style, which definitely includes this article and in fact virtually every article Maelstrom has criticized anything.
The fact you call Maelstrom arrogant, but then complain about his 'abrasive and hostile' style, smacks of hypocrisy of the highest order.
And i still do not understand your huge fixation on 'readership', Maelstrom is not payed or in some way 'given' anything by any segment of gamer, so why must be owe special treatment to some segment? so why is this huge fixation on 'readership'? why is it somehow especially wrong of Maelstrom to criticize a segment of gamers (which iirc is the hardcore elitist type gamers)?
If you hate Maelstrom's style, dont call him arrogant, you are the same as him.
If you want to accept calling Maelstrom arrogant, then accept that Maelstrom will be 'hostile' in his criticisms to groups or people.
You are not criticisng whether he is factually correct, you are criticising him on his manner, a manner which you yourself display.
