noname2200 said:
Review this thread. Point out where I disagreed with Malstrom's conclusion regarding this article. Then get back to me. As a second assignment, tell me whether you think that I would consider Malstrom's article an insult to the readership. |
Review my post, did i state you disagreed with Maelstroms conclusion?
The point is, you call Maelstrom arrogant, Maelstrom calls the reviewers 'whining to downplay an issue'.
I see no difference, and there is no difference.
You can extend everything further, Maelstrom criticises (anyone, this includes what you consider 'readership') and calls them (anything).
Its what your doing to Maelstrom.
Of course you've yet to really understand that Maelstrom's blog post, has no loyalty to any 'readership' he gets no funding from a particular segment of readers or anything like that.
Why Maelstrom should not criticize a segment of gamers, is beyond me.
Nor have you given me any links yet to this perceived 'calling his readers idiots'.
Go and give me a link then you can talk.







