My post was about the ps3 version, but ok we can get off topic and talk about the PC version if you desire.
It doesn't matter what bar is set for PC shooters, there are higher ranked more hyped shooters on it now. You think that is a good excuse for UT3 getting mid-eighties reviews, meanwhile Bioshock (95%), Orange Box (96%), COD 4 (93%), Crysis (92%) and even a year old port of Gears of war has been more well received thus far.
I think you were trying to say the same games on PC were ranked lower than console versions, meanwhile the Bioshock and Orange Box versions are identically ranked to the other version. Acting like Gears of war got lower because it's on PC, instead of because it's a one year old port is ridiculous. COD 4 just has a lot less reviews too, once it gets more it'll be around the same as past games this year have shown.
*Back On Topic*
But I don't think you got what I meant in that section you quoted. I didn't state it clearly but I meant the reviews the PC version is getting will translate to the PS3 version and THAT system has better, more hyped games out on it. The difference between equal quality PC/Console game reviews is 1-2% at most and Americans aren't going to help it sell better on PS3 when there's more accessible (read: popular) mainstream titles on that system. It doesn't even have a built in fan base like the PC version.
