stof said:
Your right, but there are infinate possibilities of what can technically possibly exist. Ultimately, we can never really prove or disprove anything. But we can't actually operate on that principal. I can't prove that you, I or videogames exist. I can't prove that I'm not a dream, and I can't prove that when I wake up in the morning and get out of bed that the floor won't dissapear and I'll float off in to nothingness. But I can't spend all day wrapped in my covers screaming that there might not be a floor. Ultimately, we have to first acknwledge that nothing can ever truly be proven or disproven, and then we have to completely ignore that technicality. I think the ideas behind it have already been described in this thread far better than I can.
|
Ahh so you acknowledge the possibility that there could be a god, even though it is incredibaly unlikely. That was all that I was asking.









