elprincipe said:
Your confidence in government is exceedingly naive. I've lived in the Washington, DC area most of my life. I've seen these guys at work. Government efficiency is an oxymoron. You think that government-run health care is more efficient than private? Prove it. I'll be prepared to eat crow if you do, but I seriously doubt ever having to do that. Constant drain of money to stockholders? Yeah...government does so well with its finances that it has a debt of over $9.1 trillion currently (http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/) that is increasing every second of every minute of every day. Yeah, sure, government has less bureaucracy and higher efficiency...except that it never has for any government program in the history of mankind. I await any proof (nonexistent though it may be) to the contrary. Note that I am not defending CEO pay packages, some of which are ridiculous. |
Dude, check my first post in the thread. I detail how the US medical system, with the least government involvement in the developed world, is among the least efficient.
You do have a point that the US government often does a terrible job of administrating public programs. That's a failure of your government, not a failure of public health care systems in general. There are a great deal of public or partially public health care systems that work much more effectively than the US private system.
It may not be easy, but it is possible to get better performance out of your government. They say that in democracies, people get the government they deserve...

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







