CGI-Quality said:
I concur. |
I think it's more like less than double the price of the cheapest offering. All MS needs to do is maintain the cost at about 50% of the PS3, which really by now should be fairly easy so I don't see why they didn't cut the price. Probably so they can afford to bundle Natal AND potentially cut the price next fall at the same time. If Valhalla is ready by then (which it was rumored to be ready by end of 09) then that would mean huge cost savings. Maybe MS could even shrink their system a bit and move the cooling fans to not waste all that empty space... 







