How can Sony and Microsoft's motion controllers be more impactful than WM+?

[Cheebee]

Carl2291 said:

Cheebee said:

Carl2291 said:

Cheebee said:
Lol, GT5 was supposed the be 'the' defining race game, ultra-realistic and all that right? So, then yeah driving a car with a big fat red glowing popsicle is definitely uber-realism at its best...

X'D

Just as realistic as playing it moving the car with your thumbs, yeah?

Of course to get the most realistic experience you will use a wheel.

@bdbdbd, like i said... I dunno, maybe its something small like what... Painting your car or something. Of course, the camera can be used too for the 3D "looking around corners" thing.

Yeah, using the sticks is an unrealistic way too, of course, I never said it wasn't.

But not half as unrealistic as the glowing icecream cone, please. :p I can see those hardcore snobs now... 'Man, dude, this game is HARDCORE! Like, totally manly and not for kids! It's such a realistic and adult game man, just look how awesome and cool those cars look!'

'But, dude, man, what's that glowing red phallic cone you're holding...?'

'Nevermind that, man, dude, just look at the game! It's so REALISTIC it hurts my eyes!'

X'D

Yeaaah i know what you saying, but more options for playing never hurt anyone... As long as they dont focus more on that than they do the rest of the gameplay.

Nah, I wouldn't worry about that, I mean, they've been working on the game for what, close to eternity now? I'm sure everything will be fine and well-implemented, the motion thing will probably just be an optional distraction anyway, not a defining feature.