Haste262 on 27 November 2009
Chairman-Mao said:
I do. Its certainly not as revolutionary as CoD4 which basically saved the CoD franchise and is now the game that everyone tries to mimic, but it takes everything CoD4 did right and made it better. Better graphics, customizable kill streaks, more challenges, more ranks, more gun attachments, etc. Sure it's more like Modern Warfare 1.5 but its still amazing and worth the $60. |
Worse online, less players and no dedi servers. Weaker story. Costs more. They unbalance things with riot shields and shotguns that any nub can own the best player whove ever lived. It actually goes back in some things. I thought it was one of the worst ones yet tbh. For me, W@W>MW's. I honestly cant see it being the best one, nowhere near. Cod 2 trounces it.
