NJ5 on 27 November 2009
What exactly is your point?
My point is that you're wrong in calling everything that happened with the PS3 a necessary sacrifice that Sony did on purpose.
Sony expected to lose money on the ps3 because it costed roughly 870$ at launch, and still costs them anywhere from 40-80$ more than the price of the machine, even after 3 years.
They expected the losses at launch... that's obvious.
But when they launched it, did they expect to drop prices so fast that even after all these years, they're still unprofitable both on hardware and overall? No. I don't believe that. I hope you don't either, and that this argument is all based on a mutual misunderstanding.
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
