SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
The time? It took me just as long to do it... as it's took you to reply to it.
No time at all.
Another fun bit of education for you.
He was offered a plea bargain of 3 to 4 years if he would of turned himself in already.
Which is actually less then the 5 years (not 6 months) he would of got in the UK. The 6 months only being for a first offense.
It's this simple. "If it seems to good to be true it is."
And
"Don't have strong opinions about things you haven't researched".
|
I think the personal attack on me when others didnt read all these other sources, was completley out of order by the way, also to note, when it comes to data/sources I would have thought that surely you knew that Quality is more important thatn Quantity. not neccessarily relevant in this case, but generally I think its worth noting.
It didnt seem to good to be true to me, that point seems irrelevant to this?
er, dont most people do that, I will try and find more info in future if you really think none of the sources I use are worthwhile and all of yours our, perhaps I should ask for a list of acceptable sources from you then?
|
There was no "personal" attack on you. Just on your unworkable opinions on things extradiction that would pretty much ruin international crime efforts. Claiming the US and UK shouldn't have an extradition treaty is asnine.
As for quality vs quanity... a number of well respected news sites will always trump one respected news site. Even if it was the most respected news site... because of how news works.
|
as long as you are using well respected sites 
I dont consider my opinions unworkable, that also wasnt what I was saying, I was saying that the US legal system still practices something that we block other nations from extradition because of.
|
New York Times, Times, Telegraphi, Other BBC articles.
It took about as much time as it took you to reply.
